virtuallypotato/content/posts/2022/ldaps-authentication-tanzu-community-edition/index.md
2022-03-07 08:35:22 -06:00

25 KiB
Raw Blame History

title date description featured draft toc usePageBundles thumbnail shareImage codeLineNumbers series tags comment
Active Directory authentication in Tanzu Community Edition 2022-03-06 Deploying and configuring a Tanzu Community Edition Kubernetes cluster to support authentication with Active Directory users and groups by using pinniped and dex false false true true ldaps_test.png ldaps_test.png false Projects
vmware
kubernetes
tanzu
activedirectory
certs
cluster
containers
true

Not long ago, I deployed a Tanzu Community Edition Kubernetes cluster in my homelab, and then I fumbled through figuring out how to log into it from a different device than the one I'd used for deploying the cluster from the tanzu cli. That setup works great for playing with Kubernetes in my homelab but I'd love to do some Kubernetes with my team at work and I really need the ability to authenticate multiple users with domain credentials for that.

The TCE team has created a rather detailed guide for using the Pinniped and Dex packages1 to provide LDAPS authentication when TCE is connected with the NSX Advanced Load Balancer. This guide got me most of the way toward a working solution but I had to make some tweaks along the way (particularly since I'm not using NSX-ALB). I took notes as I worked through it, though, so here I'll share what it actually took to make this work in my environment.

Prequisite

In order to put the "Secure" in LDAPS, I need to make sure my Active Directory domain controller is configured for that, and that means also creating a Certificate Authority for issuing certificates. I followed the steps here to get this set up in my homelab. I can then point my browser to http://win01.lab.bowdre.net/certsrv/certcarc.asp to download the base64-encoded CA certificate since I'll need that later. Downloading the CA cert

With that sorted, I'm ready to move on to creating a new TCE cluster with an LDAPS identity provider configured.

Cluster creation

The cluster deployment steps are very similar to what I did last time so I won't repeat all those instructions here. The only difference is that this time I don't skip past the Identity Management screen; instead, I'll select the LDAPS radio button and get ready to fill out the form.

Identity management configuration

Identity Management section

LDAPS Identity Management Source

Field Value Notes
LDAPS Endpoint win01.lab.bowdre.net:636 LDAPS interface of my AD DC
BIND DN CN=LDAP Bind,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net DN of an account with LDAP read permissions
BIND Password ******* Password for that account

User Search Attributes

Field Value Notes
Base DN OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net DN for the top-level OU containing my users
Filter objectClass=(person)
Username sAMAccountName I want to auth as john rather than john@lab.bowdre.net (userPrincipalName)

Group Search Attributes

Field Value Notes
Base DN OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net DN for OU containing my users
Filter (objectClass=group)
Name Attribute cn Common Name
User Attribute DN Distinguished Name (capitalization matters!)
Group Attribute member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: Used to enumerate which groups a user is a member of2

And I'll copy the contents of the base64-encoded CA certificate I downloaded earlier and paste them into the Root CA Certificate field.

Completed Identity Management section

Before moving on, I can use the Verify LDAP Configuration button to quickly confirm that the connection is set up correctly. (I discovered that it doesn't honor the attribute selections made on the previous screen so I have to search for my Common Name (John Bowdre) instead of my username (john), but this at least lets me verify that the connection and certificate are working correctly.) LDAPS test

I can then click through the rest of the wizard but (as before) I'll stop on the final review page. Despite entering everything correctly in the wizard I'll actually need to make a small edit to the deployment configuration YAML so I make a note of its location and copy it to a file called tce-mgmt-deploy.yaml in my working directory so that I can take a look. Reviewing the cluster configuration file

Editing the cluster spec

Remember that awkward member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: attribute from earlier? Here's how it looks within the TCE cluster-defining YAML:

LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_BASE_DN: OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_FILTER: (objectClass=group)
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_GROUP_ATTRIBUTE: 'member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:'
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_NAME_ATTRIBUTE: cn
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_USER_ATTRIBUTE: DN

That : at the end of the line will cause problems down the road - specifically when the deployment process creates the dex app which handles the actual LDAPS authentication piece. Cumulative hours of troubleshooting (and learning!) eventually revealed to me that something along the way had choked on that trailing colon and inserted this into the dex configuration:

userMatchers:
- userAttr: DN
  groupAttr: 
    member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: null

It should look like this instead:

userMatchers:
- userAttr: DN
  groupAttr: 'member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:'

That error prevents dex from starting correctly so the authentication would never work. I eventually figured out that using the | character to define the attribute as a literal scalar would help to get around this issue so I changed the cluster YAML to look like this:

LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_BASE_DN: OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_FILTER: (objectClass=group)
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_GROUP_ATTRIBUTE: |
  'member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:'  
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_NAME_ATTRIBUTE: cn
LDAP_GROUP_SEARCH_USER_ATTRIBUTE: DN

Deploying the cluster

That's the only thing I need to manually edit so now I can go ahead and create the cluster with:

tanzu management-cluster create tce-mgmt -f tce-mgmt-deploy.yaml

This will probably take 10-15 minutes to deploy so it's a great time to go top off my coffee.

Coffee break!

And we're back - and with a friendly success message in the console:

You can now access the management cluster tce-mgmt by running 'kubectl config use-context tce-mgmt-admin@tce-mgmt'
Management cluster created!

You can now create your first workload cluster by running the following:
  tanzu cluster create [name] -f [file]

Some addons might be getting installed! Check their status by running the following:

  kubectl get apps -A

I obediently follow the instructions to switch to the correct context and verify that the addons are all running:

 kubectl config use-context tce-mgmt-admin@tce-mgmt
Switched to context "tce-mgmt-admin@tce-mgmt".

 kubectl get apps -A
NAMESPACE    NAME                   DESCRIPTION           SINCE-DEPLOY   AGE
tkg-system   antrea                 Reconcile succeeded   5m2s           11m
tkg-system   metrics-server         Reconcile succeeded   39s            11m
tkg-system   pinniped               Reconcile succeeded   4m55s          11m
tkg-system   secretgen-controller   Reconcile succeeded   65s            11m
tkg-system   tanzu-addons-manager   Reconcile succeeded   70s            11m
tkg-system   vsphere-cpi            Reconcile succeeded   32s            11m
tkg-system   vsphere-csi            Reconcile succeeded   66s            11m

Post-deployment tasks

I've got a TCE cluster now but it's not quite ready for me to authenticate with my AD credentials just yet.

Load Balancer deployment

The guide I'm following from the TCE site assumes that I'm using NSX-ALB in my environment, but I'm not. So, as before, I'll need to deploy Scott Rosenberg's kube-vip Carvel package:

git clone https://github.com/vrabbi/tkgm-customizations.git
cd tkgm-customizations/carvel-packages/kube-vip-package
kubectl apply -n tanzu-package-repo-global -f metadata.yml
kubectl apply -n tanzu-package-repo-global -f package.yaml
cat << EOF > values.yaml
vip_range: 192.168.1.64-192.168.1.70
EOF
tanzu package install kubevip -p kubevip.terasky.com -v 0.3.9 -f values.yaml

Modifying services to use the Load Balancer

With the load balancer in place, I can follow the TCE instruction to modify the Pinniped and Dex services to switch from the NodePort type to the LoadBalancer type so they can be easily accessed from outside of the cluster. This process starts by creating a file called pinniped-supervisor-svc-overlay.yaml and pasting in the following overlay manifest:

#@ load("@ytt:overlay", "overlay")
#@overlay/match by=overlay.subset({"kind": "Service", "metadata": {"name": "pinniped-supervisor", "namespace": "pinniped-supervisor"}})
---
#@overlay/replace
spec:
  type: LoadBalancer
  selector:
    app: pinniped-supervisor
  ports:
    - name: https
      protocol: TCP
      port: 443
      targetPort: 8443

#@ load("@ytt:overlay", "overlay")
#@overlay/match by=overlay.subset({"kind": "Service", "metadata": {"name": "dexsvc", "namespace": "tanzu-system-auth"}}), missing_ok=True
---
#@overlay/replace
spec:
  type: LoadBalancer
  selector:
    app: dex
  ports:
    - name: dex
      protocol: TCP
      port: 443
      targetPort: https

This overlay will need to be inserted into the pinniped-addon secret which means that the contents need to be converted to a base64-encoded string:

 base64 -w 0 pinniped-supervisor-svc-overlay.yaml
I0AgbG9hZCgi[...]==

{{% notice info "Avoid newlines" %}} The -w 0 / --wrap=0 argument tells base64 to not wrap the encoded lines after a certain number of characters. If you leave this off, the string will get a newline inserted every 76 characters, and those linebreaks would make the string a bit more tricky to work with. Avoid having to clean up the output afterwards by being more specific with the request up front! {{% /notice %}}

I'll copy the resulting base64 string (which is much longer than the truncated form I'm using here), and paste it into the following command to patch the secret (which will be named after the management cluster name so replace the tce-mgmt part as appropriate):

 kubectl -n tkg-system patch secret tce-mgmt-pinniped-addon -p '{"data": {"overlays.yaml": "I0AgbG9hZCgi[...]=="}}'
secret/tce-mgmt-pinniped-addon patched

I can watch as the pinniped-supervisor and dexsvc services get updated with the new service type:

 kubectl get svc -A
NAMESPACE               NAME                    TYPE            CLUSTER-IP       EXTERNAL-IP    PORT(S)           
pinniped-supervisor     pinniped-supervisor     NodePort        100.65.185.82    <none>         443:31234/TCP     
tanzu-system-auth       dexsvc                  NodePort        100.70.238.106   <none>         5556:30167/TCP    
tkg-system              packaging-api           ClusterIP       100.65.185.94    <none>         443/TCP           
tanzu-system-auth       dexsvc                  LoadBalancer    100.70.238.106   <pending>      443:30167/TCP     
pinniped-supervisor     pinniped-supervisor     LoadBalancer    100.65.185.82    <pending>      443:31234/TCP     
pinniped-supervisor     pinniped-supervisor     LoadBalancer    100.65.185.82    192.168.1.70   443:31234/TCP     
tanzu-system-auth       dexsvc                  LoadBalancer    100.70.238.106   192.168.1.64   443:30167/TCP     

I'll also need to restart the pinniped-post-deploy-job job to account for the changes I just made; that's accomplished by simply deleting the existing job. After a few minutes a new job will be spawned automagically. I'll just watch for the new job to be created:

 kubectl -n pinniped-supervisor delete jobs pinniped-post-deploy-job
job.batch "pinniped-post-deploy-job" deleted
 kubectl get jobs -A -w
NAMESPACE             NAME                       COMPLETIONS   DURATION   AGE
pinniped-supervisor   pinniped-post-deploy-job   0/1                      0s
pinniped-supervisor   pinniped-post-deploy-job   0/1                      0s
pinniped-supervisor   pinniped-post-deploy-job   0/1           0s         0s
pinniped-supervisor   pinniped-post-deploy-job   1/1           9s         9s

Authenticating

Right now, I've got all the necessary components to support LDAPS authentication with my TCE management cluster but I haven't done anything yet to actually define who should have what level of access. To do that, I'll create a ClusterRoleBinding.

I'll toss this into a file I'll call tanzu-admins-crb.yaml:

kind: ClusterRoleBinding
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
  name: tanzu-admins
subjects:
  - kind: Group
    name: Tanzu-Admins
    apiGroup:
roleRef:
  kind: ClusterRole
  name: cluster-admin
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

I have a group in Active Directory called Tanzu-Admins which contains a group called vRA-Admins, and that group contains my user account (john). It's a roundabout way of granting access for a single user in this case but it should help to confirm that nested group memberships are being enumerated properly.

Once applied, users within that group will be granted the cluster-admin role3.

Let's do it:

 kubectl apply -f tanzu-admins-crb.yaml
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/tanzu-admins created

Thus far, I've been using the default administrator context to interact with the cluster. Now it's time to switch to the non-admin context:

 tanzu management-cluster kubeconfig get
You can now access the cluster by running 'kubectl config use-context tanzu-cli-tce-mgmt@tce-mgmt'

 kubectl config use-context tanzu-cli-tce-mgmt@tce-mgmt
Switched to context "tanzu-cli-tce-mgmt@tce-mgmt".

After assuming the non-admin context, the next time I try to interact with the cluster it should kick off the LDAPS authentication process. It won't look like anything is happening in the terminal:

 kubectl get nodes

But it will shortly spawn a browser page prompting me to log in: Dex login prompt

Doing so successfully will yield: Dex login success!

And the kubectl command will return the expected details:

 kubectl get nodes
NAME                            STATUS   ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
tce-mgmt-control-plane-v8l8r    Ready    control-plane,master   29h   v1.21.5+vmware.1
tce-mgmt-md-0-847db9ddc-5bwjs   Ready    <none>                 28h   v1.21.5+vmware.1

It's working!!! Holy crap, I can't believe it.

So I've now successfully logged in to the management cluster as a non-admin user with my Active Directory credentials. Excellent!

Sharing access

To allow other users to log in this way, I'd need to give them a copy of the non-admin kubeconfig, which I can get by running tanzu management-cluster config get --export-file tce-mgmt-config to export it into a file named tce-mgmt-config. They could use whatever method they like to merge this in with their existing kubeconfig.

{{% notice tip "Tanzu CLI required" %}} Other users hoping to work with a Tanzu Community Edition cluster will also need to install the Tanzu CLI tool in order to authenticate in this way. Installation instructions can be found here. {{% /notice %}}

Deploying a workload cluster

At this point, I've only configured authentication for the management cluster - not the workload cluster. The TCE community docs cover what's needed to make this configuration available in the workload cluster as well here. As before, I created the deployment YAML for the workload cluster by copying the management cluster's deployment YAML and changing the CLUSTER_NAME and VSPHERE_CONTROL_PLANE_ENDPOINT values accordingly. This time I also deleted all of the LDAP_* and OIDC_* lines, but made sure to preserve the IDENTITY_MANAGEMENT_TYPE: ldap one.

I was then able to deploy the workload cluster with:

 tanzu cluster create --file tce-work-deploy.yaml
Validating configuration...
Creating workload cluster 'tce-work'...
Waiting for cluster to be initialized...
cluster control plane is still being initialized: WaitingForControlPlane
cluster control plane is still being initialized: ScalingUp
Waiting for cluster nodes to be available...
Waiting for addons installation...
Waiting for packages to be up and running...

Workload cluster 'tce-work' created

Access the admin context:

 tanzu cluster kubeconfig get --admin tce-work
Credentials of cluster 'tce-work' have been saved
You can now access the cluster by running 'kubectl config use-context tce-work-admin@tce-work'

 kubectl config use-context tce-work-admin@tce-work
Switched to context "tce-work-admin@tce-work".

Apply the same ClusterRoleBinding from before4:

 kubectl apply -f tanzu-admins-crb.yaml
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/tanzu-admins created

And finally switch to the non-admin context and log in with my AD account:

 tanzu cluster kubeconfig get tce-work
  You can now access the cluster by running 'kubectl config use-context tanzu-cli-tce-work@tce-work'

 kubectl config use-context tanzu-cli-tce-work@tce-work
Switched to context "tanzu-cli-tce-work@tce-work".

 kubectl get nodes
NAME                            STATUS   ROLES                  AGE   VERSION
tce-work-control-plane-zts6r    Ready    control-plane,master   12m   v1.21.5+vmware.1
tce-work-md-0-bcfdc4d79-vn9xb   Ready    <none>                 11m   v1.21.5+vmware.1

Now I can Do Work! Back to the grind

{{% notice note "Create DHCP reservations for control plane nodes" %}} VMware points out that it's important to create DHCP reservations for the IP addresses which were dynamically assigned to the control plane nodes in both the management and workload clusters so be sure to take care of that before getting too involved in Work. {{% /notice %}}

Troubleshooting notes

It took me quite a bit of trial and error to get this far and (being a k8s novice) even more time figuring out how to even troubleshoot the problems I was encountering. So here are a few tips that helped me out.

Checking and modifying dex configuration

I had a lot of trouble figuring out how to correctly format the member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: attribute in the LDAPS config so that it wouldn't get split into multiple attributes due to the trailing colon - and it took me forever to discover that was even the issue. What eventually did the trick for me was learning that I could look at (and modify!) the configuration for the dex app with:

 kubectl -n tanzu-system-auth edit configmaps dex
[...]
            groupSearch:
                baseDN: OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net
                filter: (objectClass=group)
                nameAttr: cn
                scope: sub
                userMatchers:
                    - userAttr: DN
                      groupAttr: 'member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:'
            host: win01.lab.bowdre.net:636
[...]

This let me make changes on the fly until I got a working configuration and then work backwards from there to format the initial input correctly.

Reviewing dex logs

Authentication attempts (at least on the LDAPS side of things) will show up in the logs for the dex pod running in the tanzu-system-auth namespace. This is a great place to look to see if the user isn't being found, credentials are invalid, or the groups aren't being enumerated correctly:

 kubectl -n tanzu-system-auth get pods
NAME                   READY   STATUS    RESTARTS   AGE
dex-7bf4f5d4d9-k4jfl   1/1     Running   0          40h

 kubectl -n tanzu-system-auth logs dex-7bf4f5d4d9-k4jfl
# no such user
{"level":"info","msg":"performing ldap search OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net sub (\u0026(objectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=johnny))","time":"2022-03-06T22:29:57Z"}
{"level":"error","msg":"ldap: no results returned for filter: \"(\u0026(objectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=johnny))\"","time":"2022-03-06T22:29:57Z"}
#invalid password
{"level":"info","msg":"performing ldap search OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net sub (\u0026(objectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=john))","time":"2022-03-06T22:30:45Z"}
{"level":"info","msg":"username \"john\" mapped to entry CN=John Bowdre,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net","time":"2022-03-06T22:30:45Z"}
{"level":"error","msg":"ldap: invalid password for user \"CN=John Bowdre,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net\"","time":"2022-03-06T22:30:45Z"}
# successful login
{"level":"info","msg":"performing ldap search OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net sub (\u0026(objectClass=person)(sAMAccountName=john))","time":"2022-03-06T22:31:21Z"}
{"level":"info","msg":"username \"john\" mapped to entry CN=John Bowdre,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net","time":"2022-03-06T22:31:21Z"}
{"level":"info","msg":"performing ldap search OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net sub (\u0026(objectClass=group)(member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941:=CN=John Bowdre,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net))","time":"2022-03-06T22:31:21Z"}
{"level":"info","msg":"login successful: connector \"ldap\", username=\"john\", preferred_username=\"\", email=\"CN=John Bowdre,OU=Users,OU=BOW,OU=LAB,DC=lab,DC=bowdre,DC=net\", groups=[\"vRA-Admins\" \"Tanzu-Admins\"]","time":"2022-03-06T22:31:21Z"}

Clearing pinniped sessions

I couldn't figure out an elegant way to log out so that I could try authenticating as a different user, but I did discover that information about authenticated sessions get stored in ~/.config/tanzu/pinniped/sessions.yaml. The sessions expired after a while but until that happens I'm able to keep on interacting with kubectl - and not given an option to re-authenticate even if I wanted to.

So in lieu of a handy logout option, I was able to remove the cached sessions by deleting the file:

rm ~/.config/tanzu/pinniped/sessions.yaml

That let me use kubectl get nodes to trigger the authentication prompt again.

Conclusion

So this is a pretty basic walkthrough of how I set up my Tanzu Community Edition Kubernetes clusters for Active Directory authentication in my homelab. I feel like I've learned a lot more about TCE specifically and Kubernetes in general through this process, and I'm sure I'll learn more in the future as I keep experimenting with the setup.


  1. Per VMware, "Pinniped provides the authentication service, which uses Dex to connect to identity providers such as Active Directory." ↩︎

  2. Setting this to just member would work, but it wouldn't return any nested group memberships. I struggled with this for a long while until I came across a post from Brian Ragazzi which mentioned using member:1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: instead. This leverages a special LDAP matching rule OID to expand the nested groups. ↩︎

  3. You can read up on some other default user-facing roles here. ↩︎

  4. Or a different one. In reality, you probably don't want the same users having the same levels of access on both the management and workload clusters. But I stuck with just the one here for now. ↩︎