From 172e356ecc1f0b8a69ceb5239a7bfcaa777c6a29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Bowdre Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:33:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] add tailscale tags --- archetypes/default.md | 1 + .../posts/secure-networking-made-simple-with-tailscale/index.md | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/archetypes/default.md b/archetypes/default.md index 1438145..810f43b 100644 --- a/archetypes/default.md +++ b/archetypes/default.md @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ tags: - selfhosting - serverless - shell + - tailscale - tasker - terraform - vmware diff --git a/content/posts/secure-networking-made-simple-with-tailscale/index.md b/content/posts/secure-networking-made-simple-with-tailscale/index.md index f38d63c..a69b118 100644 --- a/content/posts/secure-networking-made-simple-with-tailscale/index.md +++ b/content/posts/secure-networking-made-simple-with-tailscale/index.md @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ tags: - linux - networking - security + - tailscale comment: true # Disable comment if false. --- Not all that long ago, I shared about a [somewhat-complicated WireGuard VPN setup](/cloud-based-wireguard-vpn-remote-homelab-access/) that I had started using to replace my previous OpenVPN solution. I raved about WireGuard's speed, security, and flexible (if complex) Cryptokey Routing, but adding and managing peers with WireGuard is a fairly manual (and tedious) process. And while I thought I was pretty clever for using a WireGuard peer in GCP to maintain a secure tunnel into my home network without having to punch holes through my firewall, routing all my traffic through The Cloud wasn't really optimal[^egress_fees].